Sanity Reporter — evidence-based coherence report
Anyone can say they're trustworthy. Almost nobody can show the evidence.
Sanity Reporter reads the language strangers already use about you — years of public reviews, service records and your own self-statement — and scores it across 21 points. Green, amber, red. Nothing quietly deleted.
Sanity Reporter is not a medical or psychological diagnosis tool. It is an evidence-based report on character, reputation, service, functionality and coherence, built from public testimony, service outcomes, review language and self-report comparison.
How the score is built
Strangers get the biggest vote. You get the smallest.
A profile assembled from what you say about yourself is a brochure. This one weights people who had nothing to gain by writing it — then checks whether your own account survives contact with theirs.
- 40% Stranger review evidence
- 25% Business service record
- 15% Self-assessment and personal statement
- 10% Peer or community witness
- 10% Contradictory evidence review
Inside the report
Five things a testimonial page can't do.
-
01
The reality gap test
How you describe yourself, set beside how hundreds of strangers described you. Both columns published, with the distance between them marked.
-
02
Language patterns, not impressions
Words that repeat across years of testimony carry weight. One glowing quote or one bad night does not. The report counts the pattern and shows you the count.
-
03
A 21-point scorecard
Communication, reliability, emotional regulation, problem solving, generosity, service consistency, reputation strength and more — each scored, each given a traffic-light status, each tied to the evidence behind it.
-
04
Contradictions stay in the file
Critical reviews are not deleted. They are weighted at ten per cent of the score and converted into named improvement points you can act on.
-
05
Something you can hand over
Print the full report or send the proof link when a guest, client, employer, platform or partner wants to know who they are actually dealing with.
The first subject
Risteárd put himself through it first.
Before asking anyone else to be measured, he ran the framework on his own record: 295 public guest reviews across six years, every critical one kept in the file. The result is a live report you can read end to end before you decide whether you want one.
Host, wholefoods chef, mentor, helper, community builder, cultural connector.
Host, welcoming, recommend, warm, home, friendly, kind, food, helpful, relaxed, family — the words that repeat, counted across every review.
The reality gap test is the part people find uncomfortable and useful. Where the two columns agree, you have earned the claim. Where they don't, you have a named improvement point instead of a vague worry — in this case, expectation clarity and cleanliness standards, scored amber and left in the published file.
Source evidence
Pulled from the working wall, not written for a landing page.
This guy genuinely cares about his guests. There is no better host.Matthew • USA • March 2020
Provided valuable support with integration, employment and well being.Leslie • UK • December 2023
Kind hospitality but cleanliness not on the agenda.Jean-Philippe • France • October 2019 — logged as amber
Free — no card
Get the 21-point scoring template.
The same scorecard, weighting model and traffic-light rules used in the worked example, plus a short guide to gathering your own evidence set before you start.
Find out what the evidence says about you.
Read the worked example, then run the same 21 points on your own record.